Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Alex CO2



 I again went to Ms. Ramos’ class. I didn’t think to do a different class with a different teacher, although I still gained perspective from this one. The previous class each student gave a thoroughly researched presentation on a subject of their choice. The presentation was meant to be instructional and informative for the rest of the class. This class was interesting because Ms. Ramos and the students critiqued each of the presentations and the ways in which they were presented. What I found most unique about this was the fact that students could provide such feedback on other students’ presentations, proficiency in English, and ability to adequately instruct the class. The largest problem most students found in other students’ presentations was not their pronunciation but their confidence. Looking back, I’d agree because it was these students lack of confidence that gave room to doubt in speaking and stuttering. Overall, this was a great exercise. We sat in a circle and the workshop went counter-clockwise. It was 100% student centered and driven. Also I feel it was very helpful for the students to hear a different kind of feedback; rather than a teacher of English, a student of the language.

1 comment:

  1. I liked the idea behind this circular, student-driven critique! I am definitely going to try to use this technique in my classroom.

    ReplyDelete