I again went to Ms. Ramos’ class. I didn’t
think to do a different class with a different teacher, although I still gained
perspective from this one. The previous class each student gave a thoroughly
researched presentation on a subject of their choice. The presentation was
meant to be instructional and informative for the rest of the class. This class
was interesting because Ms. Ramos and the students critiqued each of the
presentations and the ways in which they were presented. What I found most
unique about this was the fact that students could provide such feedback on
other students’ presentations, proficiency in English, and ability to
adequately instruct the class. The largest problem most students found in other
students’ presentations was not their pronunciation but their confidence.
Looking back, I’d agree because it was these students lack of confidence that
gave room to doubt in speaking and stuttering. Overall, this was a great
exercise. We sat in a circle and the workshop went counter-clockwise. It was
100% student centered and driven. Also I feel it was very helpful for the
students to hear a different kind of feedback; rather than a teacher of
English, a student of the language.
I liked the idea behind this circular, student-driven critique! I am definitely going to try to use this technique in my classroom.
ReplyDelete